Pro 4-month is live as of this morning. $599 for one hundred and twenty days on the v1 engine. Pro 1-month continues unchanged at $199 a month. The two tiers are the same product served across two durations, and the duration is now the only thing a candidate chooses.
Why two durations
Three months of Pro 1-month data say that paying candidates fall into two clean camps. The first camp is an eight-to-twelve-week sprint to a specific test date — a candidate who reads the engine, drills against the gaps the diagnostic surfaced, and sits the test. The monthly tier already served that camp without friction.
The second camp is a three-to-six-month run, usually with a target above 695 and a target date in the next admissions cycle. The monthly tier served that camp poorly. Four consecutive monthly rebillings is a worse experience than a single one-time transaction at a lower per-day cost, and the candidate already knows after the first thirty days whether they are in for the full window.
Pro 4-month is the answer to the second camp. The engine, the pool, the analytics surface, and the diagnostic re-runs are identical between the two tiers. The only delta is the duration of the commitment and the price-per-day that buys.
What it is
Both tiers include unlimited engine sessions, the running Section Analytics panel that has been in alpha since April, the diagnostic on a 30-day re-take cadence, and the scaled-score and percentile readouts written against the current GMAC table. Both tiers are priced in US dollars, billed once per cycle, and cancellable mid-cycle with the remainder prorated to the day.
What we cut
Three things are explicitly not in either Pro tier.
The Library. A full Library of interactive lessons is on the 2025 roadmap. The first batch is in authoring now and will go to a small beta inside the alpha cohort later this year. Until that work ships, Pro candidates have engine sessions, the diagnostic, and the analytics surface — and that is the entire product.
The mock exam. A faithful test-day rehearsal — full sections, real pacing, the three-change budget, the break room — is on the 2025 roadmap. Engine sessions are not mock exams; the candidate is not seated in test-day conditions, and a session that is not test-shaped is not a rehearsal.
The roadmap. A study plan the engine writes one day at a time, sequenced against a target date, is also on the 2025 roadmap. Pro candidates today read the engine's last-session summary, the gap list, and the diagnostic's predicted band — and decide for themselves which gap to spend the next session on.
How to switch
A Pro 1-month subscriber on a single billed cycle who moves to Pro 4-month gets the remaining days of the current monthly cycle credited against the first 4-month invoice. A Pro 4-month subscriber who needs to step down mid-cycle gets the unused days of the 4-month prorated against the monthly rate, the difference credited back to the candidate. The diagnostic, the session history, and the analytics surface carry across the switch unchanged.
Existing Pro 1-month subscribers will see the option to switch in their account screen this week. New candidates sign up at the same /pricing surface; the diagnostic remains free and is the recommended starting point either way.
What this changes for us
Pro 4-month is the first commitment longer than thirty days that any Brightroom candidate can make. That changes two things on our side. The session-level analytics cohort now spans four-month windows for a non-trivial slice of paying candidates, which sharpens the per-candidate calibration signal the engine consumes from long sessions. And the renewal-versus-churn signal at one hundred and twenty days will tell us something the monthly cadence could not — whether the engine still feels worth paying for at the end of the cycle, against a candidate's cumulative read of it.
That second signal is the one we are watching. We will write a longer note in the autumn about what the first 4-month cohort taught us — both as candidates and as a renewal sample.
— Brightroom Product