Pro 4-month is live as of this morning. $599 for one hundred and twenty days on the v1 engine. Pro 1-month continues unchanged at $199 a month. The two tiers are the same product served across two durations, and the duration is now the only thing a candidate chooses.
Why two durations
Three months of Pro 1-month data say that paying candidates fall into two clean camps. The first camp is an eight-to-twelve-week sprint to a specific test date. This candidate reads the engine, drills against the gaps the diagnostic surfaced, and sits the test. The monthly tier already served that camp without friction.
The second camp is a three-to-six-month run, usually with a target above 695 and a target date in the next admissions cycle. The monthly tier served that camp poorly. Four consecutive monthly rebillings is a worse experience than a single one-time transaction at a lower per-day cost, and the candidate already knows after the first thirty days whether they are in for the full window.
Pro 4-month is the answer to the second camp. The engine, the pool, the analytics surface, and the diagnostic re-runs are identical between the two tiers. The only delta is the duration of the commitment and the price-per-day that buys.
What it is
Both tiers include unlimited engine sessions, the running Section Analytics panel that has been in alpha since April, the diagnostic on a 30-day re-take cadence, and the scaled-score and percentile readouts written against the current GMAC® table. Prices are in US dollars, with any VAT or taxes shown at checkout where they apply. Pro 1-month is a recurring monthly plan you can cancel anytime to stop the next renewal. Pro 4-month is a single charge for the full 120-day term after a 5-day trial; once the trial ends it is prepaid and runs to term. It is not cancelled for a partial refund mid-term. The exact cancellation and refund rules are in the Refunds & Cancellation policy and the Terms.
What we cut
Three things are explicitly not in either Pro tier.
The Library. A full Library of interactive lessons is on the 2025 roadmap. The first batch is in authoring now and will go to a small beta inside the alpha cohort later this year. Until that work ships, Pro candidates have engine sessions, the diagnostic, and the analytics surface. That is the entire product.
The mock exam. A faithful test-day rehearsal (full sections, real pacing, the three-change budget, the break room) is on the 2025 roadmap. Engine sessions are not mock exams; the candidate is not seated in test-day conditions, and a session that is not test-shaped is not a rehearsal.
The roadmap. A study plan the engine writes one day at a time, sequenced against a target date, is also on the 2025 roadmap. Pro candidates today read the engine's last-session summary, the gap list, and the diagnostic's predicted band, then decide for themselves which gap to spend the next session on.
How to switch
A Pro 1-month subscriber who wants the longer window can move to Pro 4-month: cancel the monthly plan so it does not renew, then start the 4-month plan. The diagnostic, the session history, and the analytics surface carry across the switch unchanged. The single-charge 4-month plan is prepaid once the trial ends and is not pro-rated or refunded for a partial term. The cancellation and refund rules that apply to each plan are in the Refunds & Cancellation policy.
New candidates sign up at the same /pricing surface; the diagnostic remains free and is the recommended starting point either way.
What this changes for us
Pro 4-month is the first commitment longer than thirty days that any Brightroom candidate can make. That changes two things on our side. The session-level analytics cohort now spans four-month windows for a non-trivial slice of paying candidates, which sharpens the per-candidate calibration signal the engine consumes from long sessions. And the renewal-versus-churn signal at one hundred and twenty days will tell us something the monthly cadence could not: whether the engine still feels worth paying for at the end of the cycle, against a candidate's cumulative read of it.
That second signal is the one we are watching. We will write a longer note in the autumn about what the first 4-month cohort taught us, both as candidates and as a renewal sample.
Brightroom Product